Skip to main content

The ‘shocking’ reason why the 49ers refused to sign Jaire Alexander!

The 49ers are confusing.

The San Francisco 49ers, armed with over $46 million in salary cap space—second only to one other team in the NFL—are making headlines for their surprising decision to pass on signing free agent cornerback Jaire Alexander. The former Green Bay Packers star, widely regarded as one of the league’s premier defensive backs when healthy, signed a modest one-year, $4 million deal with the Baltimore Ravens last week. For a team like the 49ers, who are relying on five to six rookies to start on defense this season, passing on a proven veteran like Alexander seems baffling at first glance. So, why did the 49ers, with their financial flexibility, opt not to pursue him?

According to NBC Sports Bay Area’s Matt Maiocco, who spoke on KNBR this week, the answer lies in the 49ers’ confidence in their current cornerback duo and their unwillingness to pay starter-level money for a player they view as a backup. “The 49ers have their starters,” Maiocco explained. “So, I think that a guy like Alexander would have to come to the 49ers on backup money, and with the understanding of, hey, you’re our third guy.” Maiocco emphasized that the 49ers see Renardo Green and Deommodore Lenoir as their starting cornerbacks, and they weren’t prepared to offer Alexander the kind of contract or role he likely expected.

At this stage in his career, Alexander, a two-time Pro Bowler, undoubtedly sees himself as a starter—and rightfully so. His resume includes lockdown performances against some of the NFL’s best receivers, and he’s still in his prime at 28 years old. For the 49ers to ask him to accept a backup role and a corresponding salary would have been a tough sell, especially when the Ravens were willing to sign him for a bargain $4 million to bolster their already formidable secondary.

The Ravens, like the 49ers, have a strong starting duo in Marlon Humphrey and Nate Wiggins, arguably a more proven pair than Lenoir and Green. Yet, Baltimore saw the value in adding Alexander as their No. 3 cornerback, recognizing that depth and versatility in the secondary are critical in today’s pass-heavy NFL. The 49ers, by contrast, are rolling with Tre Brown and rookie Upton Stout as their primary depth options behind Lenoir and Green. Brown, while serviceable, lacks Alexander’s pedigree, and Stout is an untested rookie who may not be ready for high-stakes situations.

The 49ers’ decision becomes even more puzzling when you consider their defensive strategy. With a reliance on so many rookies, you’d think the team would prioritize veteran insurance to hedge against the inevitable growing pains of young players. A player of Alexander’s caliber could have provided mentorship, stability, and elite playmaking ability if one of the starters struggled or suffered an injury. Instead, the 49ers appear to be banking on their current roster, a gamble that could backfire if their young secondary falters against savvy veteran quarterbacks and dynamic passing attacks.

Maiocco’s explanation suggests the 49ers are prioritizing financial discipline and roster cohesion over splashing cash on a high-profile free agent. But with $46 million in cap space, the argument that they couldn’t afford to pay Alexander starter money—or at least compete with Baltimore’s $4 million offer—feels hollow. The Ravens’ willingness to sign Alexander to a budget-friendly deal highlights the 49ers’ missed opportunity to add a game-changer at a bargain price.

As the season unfolds, the 49ers may come to regret their decision. If injuries pile up or their rookie-heavy defense struggles to keep pace in the competitive NFC West, the absence of a proven veteran like Jaire Alexander could loom large. For now, the 49ers are betting on their young talent and cap flexibility to carry them forward—but only time will tell if that bet pays off or leaves them wishing they’d made a move for the former Packers star.